Changes to CQC Event Medical Regulation

Why Your Choice of Medical Provider Matters
When planning an event, the cheapest provider is not always the safest option.
The consequences of inadequate event safety planning, poor governance, ineffective medical provision, or weak command and control arrangements can be significant for both attendees and organisers. Recent high-profile incidents have demonstrated how failures in event management can lead to loss of life, regulatory investigations, reputational damage, civil claims, and the suspension of future events.

Lessons from the Manchester Arena Inquiry
Following the Manchester Arena attack in 2017, the public inquiry identified serious shortcomings in emergency preparedness, inter-agency coordination, communications, command structures, and aspects of the medical response. The findings led to numerous recommendations aimed at improving event safety and healthcare provision across the industry.
One of the key outcomes was increased scrutiny of the quality, governance and oversight of healthcare providers operating at events. This directly contributed to the decision to bring Treatment of Disease, Disorder or Injury (TDDI) services at sporting and cultural events into CQC regulation.

Lessons from the Brixton Academy Crowd Crush
The fatal crowd crush at the O2 Academy Brixton in December 2022 resulted in two deaths and serious injuries. Following the incident, the venue's licence was suspended while investigations examined crowd management, security arrangements and public safety measures.
The incident highlighted a simple reality for organisers:
When something goes wrong, investigators will examine every aspect of event planning, including the suitability of contractors, safety management systems, security providers and medical cover.

 

The Risk to Event Organisers
If an organiser appoints a medical provider that cannot demonstrate appropriate governance, clinical oversight, staff competence, regulatory compliance or suitable operating procedures, they may face:
Increased scrutiny from the Safety Advisory Group (SAG).
Difficulties obtaining licences or permissions.
Challenges with insurers.
Questions from local NHS Ambulance Trusts and emergency services.
Reputational damage following an incident.
Potential legal claims if medical provision is considered inadequate.
Regulatory investigations following serious incidents or fatalities.

Why CQC Registration Should Be Part of Your Due Diligence
While CQC registration alone does not guarantee a provider will be suitable for every event, it demonstrates that the organisation has undergone regulatory assessment against nationally recognised healthcare standards, including:
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-Led
From December 2027, providers delivering regulated TDDI services at events will be required to hold CQC registration. Choosing a provider that is already registered may provide greater assurance that appropriate governance, clinical systems and accountability arrangements are in place.

​

Adventure Sport Specific Requirements

Adventure sport events tend to entail specific medical challenges and emergencies. As per the Purple Guide these should be identified in the event risk assessment and appropriate control measure put in place to mitigate the risks well before the event takes place. Event organisers need to ensure that the medical professionals, and responders, they use have relevant experience and skills relating to the type of event they are supporting. A well-intentioned doctor, who is trained as a General Practitioner, is unlikely to make an ideal medic for an adventure sport event. Likewise, a team of responders used to festivals is unlikely to have the skill set to respond to an emergency halfway up the fell side, which is where the most serious incidents can occur.

As with all events its important that they have a minimal impact upon local statutory services (NHS Ambulance Trust) and voluntary services (Mountain Rescue etc). Events may have established relationships with a local rescue service, such as a mountain rescue team, who agree to attend the event to provide emergency medical cover. It is important to make sure that this resource is ring-fenced and understand/agree what would happen if the team is called to another emergency elsewhere. Going forward these teams if providing medical cover to events, like any private providers will require CQC registration for TDDI if the level of cover exceeds basic first aid. 

​

A Question Worth Asking
If an incident occurred at your event tomorrow, would you be confident explaining to a coroner, insurer, local authority, SAG, police force or public inquiry why you selected your medical provider?
The events at Manchester Arena and Brixton Academy demonstrate that decisions made during the planning stage can come under intense scrutiny long after the event has ended.

​

Sources: Care Quality Commission (8 May 2026; 22 June 2026), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) Regulations 2026, Manchester Arena Inquiry Volume 2 (3 November 2022), Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard (updated 16 June 2026), The Purple Guide, Event Healthcare Standard, and Lambeth Council licensing proceedings following the O2 Academy Brixton incident (December 2022–April 2023).
Sources: Care Quality Commission (8 May 2026; 22 June 2026), Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) Regulations 2026, Manchester Arena Inquiry Volume 2 (3 November 2022), Manchester Arena Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard (updated 16 June 2026), The Purple Guide, Event Healthcare Standard, and Lambeth Council licensing proceedings following the O2 Academy Brixton incident (December 2022–April 2023).